However, these excessively long ages are easily explained within the biblical worldview, and C should be present in specimens that are even a little more than 100,000 years old!
Nearly anyone can verify this for themselves using basic multiplication and division.
But I find myself ashamed that such trivial nonsense can be published in any forum. Second, the only evidence that dinosaurs have lived during the same era as humans comes from unproven sightings of the Loch Ness Monster and similar creatures. he quotes the text book correctly that dinosaurs were around for 140 million years and dying out about 65 million years ago, but then states that scientists do not dig up anything labeled with those ages. Although their comments often reflected brilliant minds, I was deeply saddened by their mockery & total rejection of anything to do with God. We are also committed to defending the Bible from the very first verse and using the Bible as our axiom for determining truth.
Many fossil dating techniques show which creatures lived side by side -- carbon dating; fossils found in soil stratifications that mark the eras; unrelated fossil creatures discovered in the same location; and tools, spears, etc. I know that some creationists can be insensitive in their remarks about evolutionists at times, but it was so refreshing to come back to your website and sense LOVE! I know we don't have all the answers, but I am so proud that you are pursuing scientific understanding as you seek to “Love the Lord thy God with all your heart, and your neighbors as yourself! Squarely put, our view is, if it’s what the Bible says, it’s true; if it goes against what the Bible says, it’s false (or at best misconstrued, due to erroneous presuppositions).5 Thus, as Bible-believing Christians, we are devoted and have immense respect for the Word of God, not allowing any other ideas to dilute or adulterate the Bible.
Evolutionists have long used the carbon-14, or radiocarbon, dating technique as a “hammer” to bludgeon Bible-believing Christians.
A straightforward reading of the Bible describes a 6,000-year-old universe, and because some carbon-14 (C) age estimates are multiple tens of thousands of years, many think that the radiocarbon method has soundly refuted the Bible’s historical accuracy.
He said that his team and the laboratories they employed took special care to avoid contamination.
That included protecting the samples, avoiding cracked areas in the bones, and meticulous pre-cleaning of the samples with chemicals to remove possible contaminants.
I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution." -- Dr.
Smallest Detectable Amount of Radiocarbon Sensitive instruments called acceleration mass spectrometers (AMS) are used to count the C/C ratio in a sample drops below 0.001 p MC?